
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2697 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 145W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2697 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,990 vs 21,064).
- ❌314.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
2021Xeon E5-2697 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 145W, a 110W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,990 vs 21,064).
- ❌314.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE better than Xeon E5-2697 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 251 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 518 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 527 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 374 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Xeon E5-2697 v4


Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,064 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2697 v4
Xeon E5-2697 v4
The Xeon E5-2697 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 20,990 points. Launch price was $2,702.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v4 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE scores 21,064 against the Xeon E5-2697 v4's 20,990 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2697 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 45 MB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,064 | 20,990 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2697 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











