
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2673 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,064 vs 21,277).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2673 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
2021Xeon E5-2673 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,064 vs 21,277).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE better than Xeon E5-2673 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 251 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 518 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 515 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 352 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE and Xeon E5-2673 v4


Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,064 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2673 v4
Xeon E5-2673 v4
The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,277 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE scores 21,064 against the Xeon E5-2673 v4's 21,277 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2673 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+100% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 50 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 5 MB+900% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 21,064 | 21,277+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE | Xeon E5-2673 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











