
Ryzen 7 9700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6346
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,349 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 642.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.5 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,145 vs 37,739).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6346
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 103.5 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 9700X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024Xeon Gold 6346
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,349 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 642.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.5 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,145 vs 37,739).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 103.5 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 9700X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 9700X better than Xeon Gold 6346?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 319 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 943 FPS |
| medium | 744 FPS | 856 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 810 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 719 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 736 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 673 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 943 FPS |
| medium | 929 FPS | 918 FPS |
| high | 850 FPS | 790 FPS |
| ultra | 756 FPS | 670 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 819 FPS |
| medium | 773 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 678 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 9700X and Xeon Gold 6346


Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X
The Ryzen 7 9700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,145 points. Launch price was $359.

Xeon Gold 6346
Xeon Gold 6346
The Xeon Gold 6346 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 37,739 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 9700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6346 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6346 — a 41.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 9700X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 9700X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,145 against the Xeon Gold 6346's 37,739 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6346. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9700X vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6346.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+53% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+23% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 37,145 | 37,739+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 9700X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 7 9700X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6346 — the Ryzen 7 9700X supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6346 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6346). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6346) — the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X870E,X670E,B650 (Ryzen 7 9700X) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6346).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 6144+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 9700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6346). The Ryzen 7 9700X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon Gold 6346 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 9700X rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon Gold 6346 rivals EPYC 73F3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 9700X launched at $359 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6346 debuted at $2708. On MSRP ($359 vs $2708), the Ryzen 7 9700X is $2349 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 9700X delivers 103.5 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6346 — making the Ryzen 7 9700X the 152.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359-87% | $2708 |
| Performance per Dollar | 103.5+645% | 13.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












