
Ryzen 7 9700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-8867 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,313 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1209.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.5 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8867 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E7-8867 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,908 vs 37,145).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 103.5 PassMark/$ ($4,672 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 9700X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024Xeon E7-8867 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,313 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1209.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.5 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $4,672 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8867 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,908 vs 37,145).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 103.5 PassMark/$ ($4,672 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 9700X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 9700X better than Xeon E7-8867 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 319 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 744 FPS | 792 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 752 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 665 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 736 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 923 FPS |
| medium | 929 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 850 FPS | 725 FPS |
| ultra | 756 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 758 FPS |
| medium | 773 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 678 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 9700X and Xeon E7-8867 v3


Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X
The Ryzen 7 9700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,145 points. Launch price was $359.

Xeon E7-8867 v3
Xeon E7-8867 v3
The Xeon E7-8867 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,908 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 9700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E7-8867 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9700X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 9700X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 9700X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,145 against the Xeon E7-8867 v3's 36,908 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 9700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9700X vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8867 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+67% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+52% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 45 MB (total)+41% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-82% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| PassMark | 37,145 | 36,908 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 850 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 9700X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 7 9700X versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — the Ryzen 7 9700X supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8867 v3 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8867 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs 32 (Xeon E7-8867 v3) — the Xeon E7-8867 v3 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X870E,X670E,B650 (Ryzen 7 9700X) and C602J (Xeon E7-8867 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+139900% | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 1536 GB+629145500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 9700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 9700X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7-8867 v3). The Ryzen 7 9700X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E7-8867 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 9700X rivals Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 9700X launched at $359 MSRP, while the Xeon E7-8867 v3 debuted at $4672. On MSRP ($359 vs $4672), the Ryzen 7 9700X is $4313 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 9700X delivers 103.5 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8867 v3 — making the Ryzen 7 9700X the 171.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon E7-8867 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359-92% | $4672 |
| Performance per Dollar | 103.5+1210% | 7.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












