
Ryzen 7 9700X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6724P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,263 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 884.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.5 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon 6724P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,145 vs 38,061).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Xeon 6724P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 103.5 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 9700X
2024Xeon 6724P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,263 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 884.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.5 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon 6724P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,145 vs 38,061).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 103.5 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 9700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 9700X better than Xeon 6724P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 319 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 220 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 952 FPS |
| medium | 744 FPS | 952 FPS |
| high | 650 FPS | 921 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 834 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 736 FPS | 866 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 761 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 632 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 929 FPS | 952 FPS |
| medium | 929 FPS | 952 FPS |
| high | 850 FPS | 952 FPS |
| ultra | 756 FPS | 821 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 952 FPS |
| medium | 773 FPS | 868 FPS |
| high | 678 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 717 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 631 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 9700X and Xeon 6724P


Ryzen 7 9700X
Ryzen 7 9700X
The Ryzen 7 9700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,145 points. Launch price was $359.

Xeon 6724P
Xeon 6724P
The Xeon 6724P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 38,061 points. Launch price was $3,622.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 9700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6724P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6724P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6724P — a 24.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 9700X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 9700X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6724P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,145 against the Xeon 6724P's 38,061 — a 2.4% lead for the Xeon 6724P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9700X vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6724P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+28% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 72 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,145 | 38,061+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 9700X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6724P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 7 9700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6724P — the Ryzen 7 9700X supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6724P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6724P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs 88 (Xeon 6724P) — the Xeon 6724P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X870E,X670E,B650 (Ryzen 7 9700X) and C741 (Xeon 6724P).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 4096 GB+1677721500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 9700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 9700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6724P). The Ryzen 7 9700X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon 6724P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6724P targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 9700X rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon 6724P rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 9700X launched at $359 MSRP, while the Xeon 6724P debuted at $3622. On MSRP ($359 vs $3622), the Ryzen 7 9700X is $3263 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 9700X delivers 103.5 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6724P — making the Ryzen 7 9700X the 163.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 9700X | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359-90% | $3622 |
| Performance per Dollar | 103.5+886% | 10.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












