
Core Ultra 5 225H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+7.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 17,500).
Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+20.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,500 vs 2,678).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+7.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+20.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 17,500).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,500 vs 2,678).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Ryzen 7 8845HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 685 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 653 FPS | 623 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 544 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 677 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen 7 8845HS

Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.


Ryzen 7 8845HS
Ryzen 7 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Ryzen 7 8845HS's 28,470 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 17,500 (18.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 2,500, a 6.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 12,250 (0.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8845HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+13% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,802+1% | 28,470 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,526 | 17,500+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,678+7% | 2,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,337 | 12,250 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 8845HS) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and SoC (Ryzen 7 8845HS).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 225H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 130T GPU | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












