
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,854).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,854).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 7840HS


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen 7 7840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 16,854 (18.5% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,962, a 7.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 11,898 (20.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 28,538+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 16,854+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+8% | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 11,898+22% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Gaming | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












