PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Why buy it

✅+95.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,342 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 509.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9575F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,000 vs 29,308).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9575F

2024

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅+95.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,342 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Delivers 509.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $11,791 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 400W, a 280W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9575F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($11,791 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 400W vs 120W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,000 vs 29,308).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9575F, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9575F better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9575F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9575F is the better fit. You are getting 95.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9575F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 7800X3D makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9575F is 2526.1% more expensive on MSRP at $11,791 MSRP versus $449 MSRP, and it gives you 95.4% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 7800X3D is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is also 509.6% better value on MSRP (76.4 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9575F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 64 cores / 128 threads instead of 8/16. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9575F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7800X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	303 FPS	266 FPS
medium	280 FPS	247 FPS
high	232 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	268 FPS	258 FPS
medium	223 FPS	215 FPS
high	172 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	179 FPS
medium	154 FPS	149 FPS
high	118 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	100 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	797 FPS	857 FPS
medium	681 FPS	737 FPS
high	536 FPS	580 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	493 FPS
1440p
low	657 FPS	722 FPS
medium	585 FPS	611 FPS
high	475 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	398 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	396 FPS
medium	332 FPS	339 FPS
high	306 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	273 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	884 FPS	857 FPS
medium	721 FPS	857 FPS
high	652 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	857 FPS
1440p
low	689 FPS	857 FPS
medium	560 FPS	851 FPS
high	494 FPS	786 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	487 FPS	558 FPS
medium	404 FPS	479 FPS
high	359 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	362 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	1118 FPS	857 FPS
medium	1007 FPS	857 FPS
high	884 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	797 FPS	782 FPS
1440p
low	884 FPS	857 FPS
medium	778 FPS	760 FPS
high	683 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	595 FPS	576 FPS
4K
low	645 FPS	618 FPS
medium	575 FPS	556 FPS
high	511 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	428 FPS

Open EPYC 9575F Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9575F and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 9575F

The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9575F packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9575F has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9575F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9575F scores 147,718 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 124.6% lead for the EPYC 9575F. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,308 vs 15,000 (64.6% advantage for the EPYC 9575F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+700%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	4.4 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+167%	96 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	147,718+331%	34,293
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,700
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,308+95%	15,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9575F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9575F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9575F) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9575F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9575F) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+4700%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9575F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9575F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.

Feature	EPYC 9575F	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / High Frequency	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9575F launched at $11791 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($11791 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $11342 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9575F delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 143.6% better value option.