
EPYC 9354
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9354
2022Why buy it
- ✅+115.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +54.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,971 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 253.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9354 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 73,892).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9354, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9354
2022Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+115.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +54.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,971 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 253.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9354 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 73,892).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9354, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 9354?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 534 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 466 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 439 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 607 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 937 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 856 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 735 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 648 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 751 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 658 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 480 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9354 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 9354
EPYC 9354
The EPYC 9354 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,892 points. Launch price was $3,420.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9354 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9354 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 3.25 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9354 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9354 scores 73,892 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 73.2% lead for the EPYC 9354. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 5 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz | 4.4 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+167% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 73,892+115% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9354 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9354 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the EPYC 9354 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9354) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9354) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9354 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 128 GB+2184433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9354 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9354 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9354 launched at $3420 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($3420 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $2971 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354 delivers 21.6 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 111.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9354 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3420 | $449-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.6 | 76.4+254% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












