EPYC 9354 vs EPYC 9354P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9354

2022

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (73,892 vs 74,808).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).

EPYC 9354P

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 9354

2022

EPYC 9354P

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $690 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (73,892 vs 74,808).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9354P better than EPYC 9354?

Yes. EPYC 9354P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9354P is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9354P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9354P is $690 cheaper on MSRP at $2,730 MSRP versus $3,420 MSRP, and it gives you 1.2% higher PassMark. It is also 26.8% better value on MSRP (27.4 vs 21.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9354P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9354 Benchmark Check

EPYC 9354P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9354	EPYC 9354P
1080p
low	176 FPS	176 FPS
medium	145 FPS	145 FPS
high	125 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	153 FPS
medium	123 FPS	123 FPS
high	99 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	71 FPS
medium	60 FPS	60 FPS
high	47 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open EPYC 9354P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9354	EPYC 9354P
1080p
low	534 FPS	534 FPS
medium	466 FPS	466 FPS
high	374 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	439 FPS	439 FPS
medium	392 FPS	392 FPS
high	324 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	255 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	270 FPS
medium	246 FPS	246 FPS
high	216 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	179 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open EPYC 9354P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9354	EPYC 9354P
1080p
low	673 FPS	673 FPS
medium	562 FPS	562 FPS
high	523 FPS	523 FPS
ultra	455 FPS	455 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	511 FPS
medium	426 FPS	426 FPS
high	390 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	377 FPS	377 FPS
medium	295 FPS	295 FPS
high	263 FPS	263 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	211 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open EPYC 9354P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9354	EPYC 9354P
1080p
low	937 FPS	937 FPS
medium	856 FPS	856 FPS
high	735 FPS	735 FPS
ultra	648 FPS	648 FPS
1440p
low	751 FPS	751 FPS
medium	658 FPS	658 FPS
high	561 FPS	561 FPS
ultra	480 FPS	480 FPS
4K
low	539 FPS	539 FPS
medium	484 FPS	484 FPS
high	423 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	366 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open EPYC 9354P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9354P

EPYC 9354

The EPYC 9354 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,892 points. Launch price was $3,420.

EPYC 9354P

The EPYC 9354P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 74,808 points. Launch price was $2,730.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9354 and EPYC 9354P share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354 versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354P — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.25 GHz vs 3.25 GHz). Both are built on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture using a 5 nm, 6 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9354 scores 73,892 against the EPYC 9354P's 74,808 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9354P. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 9354	EPYC 9354P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.25 GHz	3.25 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	256 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	73,892	74,808+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 6144 of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354) and SP5 (EPYC 9354P).

Feature	EPYC 9354	EPYC 9354P
Socket	SP5	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144	6144
RAM Channels	12	12
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9354 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 9354P rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

Feature	EPYC 9354	EPYC 9354P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9354 launched at $3420 MSRP, while the EPYC 9354P debuted at $2730. On MSRP ($3420 vs $2730), the EPYC 9354P is $690 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354 delivers 21.6 pts/$ vs 27.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 9354P — making the EPYC 9354P the 23.7% better value option.