PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9354

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (73,892 vs 74,985).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $925 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9354 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 9354

2022

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

2022

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $925 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).
✅Delivers 39.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 21.6 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,420 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (73,892 vs 74,985).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.6 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,420 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9354 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than EPYC 9354?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 26.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 26.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the better fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is $925 cheaper on MSRP at $2,495 MSRP versus $3,420 MSRP, and it gives you a 26.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 39.1% better value on MSRP (30.1 vs 21.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9354 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9354 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9354	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	176 FPS	223 FPS
medium	145 FPS	184 FPS
high	125 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	194 FPS
medium	123 FPS	156 FPS
high	99 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	94 FPS
medium	60 FPS	81 FPS
high	47 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	51 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9354	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	534 FPS	777 FPS
medium	466 FPS	660 FPS
high	374 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	439 FPS	631 FPS
medium	392 FPS	548 FPS
high	324 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	270 FPS	369 FPS
medium	246 FPS	322 FPS
high	216 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	255 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9354	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	673 FPS	783 FPS
medium	562 FPS	661 FPS
high	523 FPS	604 FPS
ultra	455 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	511 FPS	597 FPS
medium	426 FPS	503 FPS
high	390 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	394 FPS
4K
low	377 FPS	436 FPS
medium	295 FPS	351 FPS
high	263 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	253 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9354	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
1080p
low	937 FPS	1212 FPS
medium	856 FPS	1015 FPS
high	735 FPS	924 FPS
ultra	648 FPS	818 FPS
1440p
low	751 FPS	949 FPS
medium	658 FPS	826 FPS
high	561 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	480 FPS	609 FPS
4K
low	539 FPS	673 FPS
medium	484 FPS	604 FPS
high	423 FPS	527 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 9354 Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9354 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

EPYC 9354

The EPYC 9354 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,892 points. Launch price was $3,420.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9354 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9354 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 3.25 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9354 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9354 scores 73,892 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX's 74,985 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9354 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

Feature	EPYC 9354	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	32 / 64
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.5 GHz+18%
Base Clock	3.25 GHz	3.6 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+100%	128 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512K (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-29%	7 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	73,892	74,985+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	53,977
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,686
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	29,745

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9354 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9354 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — the EPYC 9354 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9354 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9354) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9354) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX).

Feature	EPYC 9354	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Socket	SP5	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+119900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144	2048 GB+34952433%
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9354 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9354) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 9354 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

Feature	EPYC 9354	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	true

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9354 launched at $3420 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX debuted at $2495. On MSRP ($3420 vs $2495), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is $925 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9354 delivers 21.6 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 32.7% better value option.