
EPYC 8124P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 8124P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 8124P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,607 vs 36,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 8124P
2023Ryzen 7 7700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 58.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 8124P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,607 vs 36,079).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8124P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7700X better than EPYC 8124P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 260 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 856 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 767 FPS | 739 FPS |
| high | 743 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 667 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 314 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 890 FPS |
| high | 769 FPS | 844 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 758 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 823 FPS | 870 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 766 FPS |
| high | 596 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 596 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8124P and Ryzen 7 7700X

EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.


Ryzen 7 7700X
Ryzen 7 7700X
The Ryzen 7 7700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,607 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 8124P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7700X — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7700X (base: 2.45 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7700X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Ryzen 7 7700X's 35,607 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7700X.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 5.4 GHz+80% |
| Base Clock | 2.45 GHz | 4.5 GHz+84% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 36,079+1% | 35,607 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 20,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7700X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7700X — the EPYC 8124P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8124P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7700X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 7700X) — the EPYC 8124P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and B650,X670,X670E,X870 (Ryzen 7 7700X).
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 | 128 GB+6553500% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7700X). The Ryzen 7 7700X includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 8124P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Ryzen 7 7700X rivals Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8124P launched at $639 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7700X debuted at $399. On MSRP ($639 vs $399), the Ryzen 7 7700X is $240 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7700X — making the Ryzen 7 7700X the 45% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8124P | Ryzen 7 7700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $639 | $399-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5 | 89.2+58% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












