PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7700X across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 20,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.5% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 7 7700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7700X.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.5% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7700X across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 20,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7700X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7700X better than Core i5-13400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7700X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 25.5% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data, 23.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 42.3% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 25.5% more average FPS across 9 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7700X is the better fit. You are getting 23.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7700X is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7700X is 103.6% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 25.5% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 43.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 89.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7700X
1080p
low	171 FPS	271 FPS
medium	158 FPS	252 FPS
high	132 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	184 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	228 FPS
medium	123 FPS	190 FPS
high	99 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	135 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	157 FPS
medium	74 FPS	132 FPS
high	59 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	87 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7700X
1080p
low	545 FPS	777 FPS
medium	464 FPS	616 FPS
high	389 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	451 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	646 FPS
medium	403 FPS	536 FPS
high	345 FPS	449 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	377 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	378 FPS
medium	247 FPS	320 FPS
high	231 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	260 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7700X
1080p
low	530 FPS	890 FPS
medium	449 FPS	739 FPS
high	415 FPS	646 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	555 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	727 FPS
medium	422 FPS	585 FPS
high	382 FPS	502 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	428 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	501 FPS
medium	331 FPS	416 FPS
high	296 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	314 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7700X
1080p
low	626 FPS	890 FPS
medium	626 FPS	890 FPS
high	626 FPS	844 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	758 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	870 FPS
medium	626 FPS	766 FPS
high	598 FPS	672 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	585 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	576 FPS
medium	492 FPS	516 FPS
high	439 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	405 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 7700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 7700X

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 7 7700X

The Ryzen 7 7700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,607 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7700X — a 16% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7700X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7700X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 7700X's 35,607 — a 34.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 20,000 (20.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7700X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,962, a 20.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 14,000 (20.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7700X). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7700X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7700X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.5 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	25,029	35,607+42%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	20,000+23%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+23%	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	14,000+23%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7700X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 7700X) — the Ryzen 7 7700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and B650,X670,X670E,X870 (Ryzen 7 7700X).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7700X
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7700X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7700X). The Ryzen 7 7700X includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 7700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 7 7700X rivals Core i7-13700K.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 7700X
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7700X debuted at $399. On MSRP ($196 vs $399), the Core i5-13400F is $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7700X — making the Core i5-13400F the 35.5% better value option.