PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7601

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7700 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7700

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +139.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2CU), while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,392 vs 35,059).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7601

2017

Ryzen 7 7700

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +139.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (2CU), while EPYC 7601 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7700 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7700 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,392 vs 35,059).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7601, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while EPYC 7601 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7700 better than EPYC 7601?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7601 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7601 is the better fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7700 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 7700 is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 139.8% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7601 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (104.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7601 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7601	Ryzen 7 7700
1080p
low	187 FPS	263 FPS
medium	165 FPS	243 FPS
high	132 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	225 FPS
medium	127 FPS	188 FPS
high	97 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	156 FPS
medium	63 FPS	131 FPS
high	48 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	87 FPS

Open EPYC 7601 Open Ryzen 7 7700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7601	Ryzen 7 7700
1080p
low	207 FPS	630 FPS
medium	188 FPS	519 FPS
high	160 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	388 FPS
1440p
low	178 FPS	537 FPS
medium	163 FPS	464 FPS
high	141 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	333 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	315 FPS
medium	103 FPS	277 FPS
high	92 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 7601 Open Ryzen 7 7700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7601	Ryzen 7 7700
1080p
low	620 FPS	860 FPS
medium	518 FPS	744 FPS
high	466 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	399 FPS	558 FPS
1440p
low	517 FPS	734 FPS
medium	432 FPS	589 FPS
high	378 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	325 FPS	430 FPS
4K
low	383 FPS	507 FPS
medium	308 FPS	420 FPS
high	270 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	317 FPS

Open EPYC 7601 Open Ryzen 7 7700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7601	Ryzen 7 7700
1080p
low	832 FPS	860 FPS
medium	759 FPS	860 FPS
high	652 FPS	850 FPS
ultra	565 FPS	756 FPS
1440p
low	666 FPS	860 FPS
medium	584 FPS	773 FPS
high	500 FPS	678 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	584 FPS
4K
low	474 FPS	581 FPS
medium	427 FPS	517 FPS
high	375 FPS	466 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	405 FPS

Open EPYC 7601 Open Ryzen 7 7700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 7 7700

EPYC 7601

The EPYC 7601 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 35,059 points. Launch price was $4,200.

Ryzen 7 7700

The Ryzen 7 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,392 points. Launch price was $339.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7601 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7601 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7601 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7700 — a 49.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7700 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 7601 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7700 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7601 scores 35,059 against the Ryzen 7 7700's 34,392 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7601. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7601 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7700.

Feature	EPYC 7601	Ryzen 7 7700
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+300%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.3 GHz+66%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+73%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-64%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	35,059+2%	34,392

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7601 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7700 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the EPYC 7601 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7700 — the EPYC 7601 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7601 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7601) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7700). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7601) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7700) — the EPYC 7601 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 7601	Ryzen 7 7700
Socket	TR4	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	2666+53220%	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	2048	128 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7700 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7700 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7601) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7700). The Ryzen 7 7700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2CU)), while the EPYC 7601 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7700 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7601 rivals Xeon Platinum 8180.