
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7445HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7445HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 19,008).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 7 7445HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7445HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 19,008).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7445HS better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 187 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 7445HS


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 7445HS
Ryzen 7 7445HS
The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 7 7445HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7445HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 7 7445HS's 19,008 — a 7.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7445HS. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB+1100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 19,008+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7445HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 7 7445HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













