PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6152.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6152, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6152 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6152

2017

Why buy it

✅+89.1% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,287 vs 24,317).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700.

Ryzen 7 5700

2022

Xeon Gold 6152

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 6152.

Why buy it

✅+89.1% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6152, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6152 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,287 vs 24,317).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700 better than Xeon Gold 6152?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6152 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700 is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700 is at an unclear MSRP at $179 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 15.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (135.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 22/44. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6152 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon Gold 6152
1080p
low	179 FPS	187 FPS
medium	152 FPS	152 FPS
high	122 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	146 FPS
medium	126 FPS	115 FPS
high	100 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	68 FPS
medium	75 FPS	57 FPS
high	60 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700 Open Xeon Gold 6152

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon Gold 6152
1080p
low	417 FPS	214 FPS
medium	352 FPS	189 FPS
high	303 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	137 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	185 FPS
medium	316 FPS	168 FPS
high	278 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	248 FPS	121 FPS
medium	224 FPS	110 FPS
high	209 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	83 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700 Open Xeon Gold 6152

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon Gold 6152
1080p
low	608 FPS	607 FPS
medium	574 FPS	563 FPS
high	519 FPS	510 FPS
ultra	431 FPS	440 FPS
1440p
low	509 FPS	560 FPS
medium	436 FPS	456 FPS
high	392 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	356 FPS
4K
low	376 FPS	407 FPS
medium	318 FPS	317 FPS
high	280 FPS	282 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	226 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700 Open Xeon Gold 6152

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon Gold 6152
1080p
low	608 FPS	607 FPS
medium	608 FPS	607 FPS
high	608 FPS	607 FPS
ultra	608 FPS	607 FPS
1440p
low	608 FPS	607 FPS
medium	608 FPS	607 FPS
high	572 FPS	550 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	468 FPS
4K
low	520 FPS	501 FPS
medium	465 FPS	449 FPS
high	414 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	345 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700 Open Xeon Gold 6152

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700 and Xeon Gold 6152

Ryzen 7 5700

The Ryzen 7 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,317 points. Launch price was $179.

Xeon Gold 6152

The Xeon Gold 6152 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,287 points. Launch price was $3,655.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6152 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon Gold 6152 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6152 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6152 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700 scores 24,317 against the Xeon Gold 6152's 24,287 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 5700 vs 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6152.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon Gold 6152
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	22 / 44+175%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+24%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+76%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	30.25 MB+89%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	22 MB+4300%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Cezanne (2021−2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	24,317	24,287
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6152 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700 versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6152 — the Xeon Gold 6152 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6152 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6152). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6152) — the Xeon Gold 6152 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A520,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6152).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700	Xeon Gold 6152
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	2666+66550%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+17476167%	768
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	48+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6152 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6152). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700 rivals Core i5-13400F; Xeon Gold 6152 rivals EPYC 7451.