
Ryzen 7 5700
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,317 vs 24,531).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700.
Ryzen 7 5700
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,317 vs 24,531).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $179 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U better than Ryzen 7 5700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 608 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U


Ryzen 7 5700
Ryzen 7 5700
The Ryzen 7 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,317 points. Launch price was $179.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,531 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700 scores 24,317 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U's 24,531 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. Both processors carry 16 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 24,317 | 24,531 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700 rivals Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700 | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











