PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+47.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
9.5% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$179 MSRP

Ryzen 7 5700

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,000 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 7 5700

2022

Why buy it

✅+47.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
9.5% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$179 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,000 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 5700?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 5700 is ahead with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 47.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13400F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 47.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i5-13400F is 9.5% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $179 MSRP, and it gives you 47.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 5700 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700 is also 6.4% better value on MSRP (135.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 5700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5700
1080p
low	171 FPS	179 FPS
medium	158 FPS	152 FPS
high	132 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	153 FPS
medium	123 FPS	126 FPS
high	99 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	84 FPS
medium	74 FPS	75 FPS
high	59 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	46 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5700
1080p
low	545 FPS	417 FPS
medium	464 FPS	352 FPS
high	389 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	268 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	360 FPS
medium	403 FPS	316 FPS
high	345 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	237 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	248 FPS
medium	247 FPS	224 FPS
high	231 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	182 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5700
1080p
low	530 FPS	608 FPS
medium	449 FPS	574 FPS
high	415 FPS	519 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	431 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	509 FPS
medium	422 FPS	436 FPS
high	382 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	376 FPS
medium	331 FPS	318 FPS
high	296 FPS	280 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	220 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5700
1080p
low	626 FPS	608 FPS
medium	626 FPS	608 FPS
high	626 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	608 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	608 FPS
medium	626 FPS	608 FPS
high	598 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	493 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	520 FPS
medium	492 FPS	465 FPS
high	439 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	358 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 5700

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 7 5700

The Ryzen 7 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,317 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700 uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 5700's 24,317 — a 2.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 11,000 (38.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,000, a 18.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 8,600 (28.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 5700.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5700
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Cezanne (2021−2025)
PassMark	25,029+3%	24,317
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+47%	11,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+20%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+33%	8,600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700) — the Ryzen 7 5700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and A520,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5700
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 5700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 7 5700 rivals Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 5700
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700 debuted at $179. On MSRP ($196 vs $179), the Ryzen 7 5700 is $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 135.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700 — making the Ryzen 7 5700 the 6.2% better value option.