
Ryzen 7 2700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2140B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.0 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Xeon W-2140B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.9 vs 53.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,319 vs 17,450).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Xeon W-2140B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.9 vs 53.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.0 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,319 vs 17,450).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 2700X better than Xeon W-2140B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 154 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 304 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 399 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon W-2140B


Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-2140B
Xeon W-2140B
The Xeon W-2140B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,319 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon W-2140B share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2140B — a 3.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-2140B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700X scores 17,450 against the Xeon W-2140B's 17,319 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2140B.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.35 GHz+4% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+45% | 11 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 17,450 | 17,319 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2140B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X) / not specified (Xeon W-2140B). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 2700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2140B debuted at $294. On MSRP ($329 vs $294), the Xeon W-2140B is $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700X delivers 53.0 pts/$ vs 58.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2140B — making the Xeon W-2140B the 10.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $294-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.0 | 58.9+11% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











