Ryzen 7 2700X vs Xeon W-11855M

AMD

Ryzen 7 2700X

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.35 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-11855M

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 2700X

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 36.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.0 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11855M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,450 vs 17,462).
  • 200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.

Xeon W-11855M

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 53.0 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-11855M better than Ryzen 7 2700X?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-11855M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 2700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-11855M is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-11855M is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-11855M is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 2700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-11855M is 36.8% more expensive on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 2700X is also 36.7% better value on MSRP (53.0 vs 38.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-11855M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
1080p
low223 FPS249 FPS
medium191 FPS230 FPS
high157 FPS192 FPS
ultra116 FPS165 FPS
1440p
low184 FPS222 FPS
medium151 FPS186 FPS
high121 FPS150 FPS
ultra89 FPS132 FPS
4K
low83 FPS154 FPS
medium73 FPS131 FPS
high58 FPS101 FPS
ultra44 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
1080p
low349 FPS437 FPS
medium306 FPS403 FPS
high270 FPS335 FPS
ultra240 FPS302 FPS
1440p
low318 FPS407 FPS
medium286 FPS344 FPS
high251 FPS297 FPS
ultra218 FPS259 FPS
4K
low233 FPS269 FPS
medium214 FPS233 FPS
high196 FPS212 FPS
ultra170 FPS181 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
1080p
low436 FPS437 FPS
medium436 FPS437 FPS
high436 FPS437 FPS
ultra436 FPS383 FPS
1440p
low436 FPS437 FPS
medium436 FPS437 FPS
high408 FPS409 FPS
ultra342 FPS333 FPS
4K
low392 FPS393 FPS
medium324 FPS341 FPS
high285 FPS295 FPS
ultra229 FPS231 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
1080p
low436 FPS437 FPS
medium436 FPS437 FPS
high436 FPS437 FPS
ultra436 FPS437 FPS
1440p
low436 FPS437 FPS
medium436 FPS437 FPS
high436 FPS437 FPS
ultra436 FPS437 FPS
4K
low436 FPS437 FPS
medium436 FPS437 FPS
high429 FPS410 FPS
ultra379 FPS352 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon W-11855M

AMD

Ryzen 7 2700X

The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon W-11855M

The Xeon W-11855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,462 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 2700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-11855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 2700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-11855M — a 11.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11855M (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-11855M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700X scores 17,450 against the Xeon W-11855M's 17,462 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-11855M. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11855M.

FeatureRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.35 GHz
4.9 GHz+13%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+16%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
18 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
12 nm
10 nm SuperFin-17%
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark
17,450
17,462
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11855M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X) / not specified (Xeon W-11855M). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.

FeatureRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 2700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11855M debuted at $450. On MSRP ($329 vs $450), the Ryzen 7 2700X is $121 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700X delivers 53.0 pts/$ vs 38.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11855M — making the Ryzen 7 2700X the 31% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 2700XXeon W-11855M
MSRP
$329-27%
$450
Performance per Dollar
53.0+37%
38.8
Release Date
2018
2021