
Ryzen 7 2700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-11855M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.0 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11855M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,450 vs 17,462).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11855M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 53.0 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Xeon W-11855M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.0 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11855M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,450 vs 17,462).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 53.0 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11855M better than Ryzen 7 2700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 181 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 352 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon W-11855M


Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-11855M
Xeon W-11855M
The Xeon W-11855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,462 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 2700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-11855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 2700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-11855M — a 11.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11855M (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-11855M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700X scores 17,450 against the Xeon W-11855M's 17,462 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-11855M. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.35 GHz | 4.9 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 12 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-17% |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 17,450 | 17,462 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11855M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X) / not specified (Xeon W-11855M). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 2700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11855M debuted at $450. On MSRP ($329 vs $450), the Ryzen 7 2700X is $121 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700X delivers 53.0 pts/$ vs 38.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11855M — making the Ryzen 7 2700X the 31% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-27% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.0+37% | 38.8 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











