
Ryzen 7 2700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2683 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,450 vs 17,459).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2683 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018Xeon E5-2683 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,450 vs 17,459).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 2700X better than Xeon E5-2683 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 2700X and Xeon E5-2683 v4


Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E5-2683 v4
Xeon E5-2683 v4
The Xeon E5-2683 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,459 points. Launch price was $1,846.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 2700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v4 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700X scores 17,450 against the Xeon E5-2683 v4's 17,459 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2683 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2683 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.35 GHz+45% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 40 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,450 | 17,459 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 2700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2683 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2683 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 2700X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2683 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 2700X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2683 v4) — the Xeon E5-2683 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 2700X) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2683 v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1536 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2683 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 2700X | Xeon E5-2683 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











