PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+43.4% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $133 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 140.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 53.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,450 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 7 2700X

2018

Why buy it

✅+43.4% higher PassMark.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $133 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 140.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 53.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,450 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 7 2700X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 2700X is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 43.4% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 43.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $133 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you 43.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 2700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 140.8% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 53.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 2700X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 2700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 2700X
1080p
low	171 FPS	223 FPS
medium	158 FPS	191 FPS
high	132 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	184 FPS
medium	123 FPS	151 FPS
high	99 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	83 FPS
medium	74 FPS	73 FPS
high	59 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	44 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 2700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 2700X
1080p
low	545 FPS	349 FPS
medium	464 FPS	306 FPS
high	389 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	318 FPS
medium	403 FPS	286 FPS
high	345 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	233 FPS
medium	247 FPS	214 FPS
high	231 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 2700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 2700X
1080p
low	530 FPS	436 FPS
medium	449 FPS	436 FPS
high	415 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	436 FPS
medium	422 FPS	436 FPS
high	382 FPS	408 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	392 FPS
medium	331 FPS	324 FPS
high	296 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	229 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 2700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 2700X
1080p
low	626 FPS	436 FPS
medium	626 FPS	436 FPS
high	626 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	436 FPS
medium	626 FPS	436 FPS
high	598 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	436 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	436 FPS
medium	492 FPS	436 FPS
high	439 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	379 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 7 2700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 2700X

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 7 2700X

The Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.35 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,450 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.35 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700X — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2700X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 7 2700X's 17,450 — a 35.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700X.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 2700X
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+6%	4.35 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	25,029+43%	17,450
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 7 2700X — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 2700X) — the Ryzen 7 2700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 2700X).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 2700X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 2700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 2700X). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 7 2700X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 7 2700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 2700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($196 vs $329), the Core i5-13400F is $133 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 53.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 2700X — making the Core i5-13400F the 82.6% better value option.