Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 PRO 220?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 4.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 25.8% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 25.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low171 FPS259 FPS
medium158 FPS237 FPS
high132 FPS199 FPS
ultra112 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS229 FPS
medium123 FPS191 FPS
high99 FPS155 FPS
ultra84 FPS137 FPS
4K
low81 FPS159 FPS
medium74 FPS134 FPS
high59 FPS104 FPS
ultra46 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low545 FPS386 FPS
medium464 FPS320 FPS
high389 FPS284 FPS
ultra356 FPS248 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS324 FPS
medium403 FPS280 FPS
high345 FPS255 FPS
ultra301 FPS218 FPS
4K
low280 FPS243 FPS
medium247 FPS214 FPS
high231 FPS201 FPS
ultra204 FPS169 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low530 FPS497 FPS
medium449 FPS497 FPS
high415 FPS497 FPS
ultra375 FPS497 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS497 FPS
medium422 FPS497 FPS
high382 FPS497 FPS
ultra343 FPS430 FPS
4K
low393 FPS484 FPS
medium331 FPS425 FPS
high296 FPS362 FPS
ultra246 FPS299 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low626 FPS497 FPS
medium626 FPS497 FPS
high626 FPS497 FPS
ultra626 FPS497 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS497 FPS
medium626 FPS497 FPS
high598 FPS497 FPS
ultra521 FPS497 FPS
4K
low535 FPS497 FPS
medium492 FPS497 FPS
high439 FPS441 FPS
ultra382 FPS377 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 22.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6 MB+380%
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
PassMark
25,029+26%
19,889
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
Socket
LGA1700
FP7/FP7r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($196 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $196 cheaper.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
MSRP
$196
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
127.7
Release Date
2023
2025