
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 8640U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,295 vs 2,519).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 10,675).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+94.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 8640U.
Why buy it
- ✅+94.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,295 vs 2,519).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 10,675).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 8640U


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 5 8640U
Ryzen 5 8640U
The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 8640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 13.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 10,675 (11.6% advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 2,519, a 64.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 10,308 (137.8% advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 20,274+15% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | 10,675+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | 2,519+95% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 10,308+443% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 5 8640U — the Ryzen 5 8640U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 8640U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 8640U) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and SoC (Ryzen 5 8640U).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-7500+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 5 8640U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












