PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9755

2024

Why buy it

✅+112.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 128 cores / 256 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌376.2% higher power demand at 500W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $12,685 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 639.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 500W, a 395W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9755 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 29,300).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 512 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9755, which brings 128 cores / 256 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9755

2024

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅+112.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 128 cores / 256 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $12,685 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Delivers 639.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $12,984 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 500W, a 395W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9755 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($12,984 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌376.2% higher power demand at 500W vs 105W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,800 vs 29,300).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 512 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9755, which brings 128 cores / 256 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9755 better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9755 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7600X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9755 is the better fit. You are getting 112.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9755 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9755 is 4242.5% more expensive on MSRP at $12,984 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you 112.3% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 7600X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 639.5% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9755 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 1500% larger total L3 cache (512 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 6/12. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9755 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	170 FPS	266 FPS
medium	141 FPS	246 FPS
high	120 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	226 FPS
medium	119 FPS	189 FPS
high	95 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	157 FPS
medium	59 FPS	131 FPS
high	47 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	87 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	581 FPS	649 FPS
medium	510 FPS	524 FPS
high	414 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	489 FPS	544 FPS
medium	437 FPS	455 FPS
high	365 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	304 FPS	341 FPS
medium	275 FPS	290 FPS
high	247 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	232 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	741 FPS	708 FPS
medium	632 FPS	652 FPS
high	574 FPS	571 FPS
ultra	505 FPS	484 FPS
1440p
low	558 FPS	708 FPS
medium	473 FPS	554 FPS
high	423 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	409 FPS
4K
low	403 FPS	463 FPS
medium	324 FPS	392 FPS
high	286 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	281 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9755	Ryzen 5 7600X
1080p
low	915 FPS	708 FPS
medium	830 FPS	708 FPS
high	715 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	632 FPS	708 FPS
1440p
low	726 FPS	708 FPS
medium	633 FPS	708 FPS
high	542 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	469 FPS	571 FPS
4K
low	524 FPS	560 FPS
medium	468 FPS	502 FPS
high	411 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	391 FPS

Open EPYC 9755 Open Ryzen 5 7600X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9755 and Ryzen 5 7600X

EPYC 9755

The EPYC 9755 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 166,328 points. Launch price was $12,984.

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9755 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9755 has 122 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9755 versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The EPYC 9755 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9755 scores 166,328 against the Ryzen 5 7600X's 28,325 — a 141.8% lead for the EPYC 9755. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,900, a 3.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,300 vs 13,800 (71.9% advantage for the EPYC 9755). L3 cache: 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9755 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X.

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen 5 7600X
Cores / Threads	128 / 256+2033%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.3 GHz+29%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	4.7 GHz+74%
L3 Cache	512 MB (total)+1500%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	6 MB+500%
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	166,328+487%	28,325
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	15,300
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800	2,900+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi	29,300+112%	13,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9755 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 173.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9755) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9755) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) — the EPYC 9755 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9755) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X).

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen 5 7600X
Socket	SP5	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	9 TB+7100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9755) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X). The Ryzen 5 7600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9755 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9755 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing, Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9755 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.

Feature	EPYC 9755	Ryzen 5 7600X
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	AMD-V
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Computing	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9755 launched at $12984 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7600X debuted at $299. On MSRP ($12984 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $12685 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9755 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 94.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7600X — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 152.4% better value option.