PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7520U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E5-4648 V3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4648 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon E5-4648 V3

2015

Why buy it

✅+650% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7520U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,061 vs 9,063).
❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7520U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7520U

2022

Xeon E5-4648 V3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E5-4648 V3 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+650% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4648 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7520U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,061 vs 9,063).
❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7520U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7520U better than Xeon E5-4648 V3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4648 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7520U is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 7520U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7520U is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7520U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4648 V3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 7520U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4648 V3 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7520U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015), a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7520U Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4648 V3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-4648 V3
1080p
low	170 FPS	159 FPS
medium	135 FPS	138 FPS
high	108 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	134 FPS
medium	112 FPS	113 FPS
high	90 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	62 FPS
medium	64 FPS	56 FPS
high	51 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-4648 V3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-4648 V3
1080p
low	227 FPS	193 FPS
medium	227 FPS	174 FPS
high	204 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	227 FPS	166 FPS
medium	199 FPS	153 FPS
high	181 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	174 FPS	109 FPS
medium	153 FPS	100 FPS
high	127 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	71 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-4648 V3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-4648 V3
1080p
low	227 FPS	227 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	227 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	227 FPS
1440p
low	227 FPS	227 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	227 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	227 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	227 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	227 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	219 FPS	227 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-4648 V3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-4648 V3
1080p
low	227 FPS	227 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	227 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	227 FPS
1440p
low	227 FPS	227 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	227 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	227 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	227 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	227 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	227 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-4648 V3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7520U and Xeon E5-4648 V3

Ryzen 5 7520U

The Ryzen 5 7520U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,063 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4648 V3

The Xeon E5-4648 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,061 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7520U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4648 V3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7520U versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4648 V3 — a 64.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7520U (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7520U uses the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7520U scores 9,063 against the Xeon E5-4648 V3's 9,061 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 7520U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7520U vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4648 V3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-4648 V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+95%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+65%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+650%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	6 nm-73%	22 nm
Architecture	Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	9,063	9,061
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,527	—
Geekbench 6 Single	797	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,744	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7520U uses the FT6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-4648 V3
Socket	FT6	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-5500	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7520U) / not specified (Xeon E5-4648 V3). The Ryzen 5 7520U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon E5-4648 V3 requires a dedicated GPU.