
Ryzen 5 7520U
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1280 v6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 72W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E3-1280 v6 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,063 vs 9,093).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Xeon E3-1280 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌380% higher power demand at 72W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7520U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022Xeon E3-1280 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 72W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E3-1280 v6 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,063 vs 9,093).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌380% higher power demand at 72W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7520U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7520U better than Xeon E3-1280 v6?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7520U | Xeon E3-1280 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7520U | Xeon E3-1280 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 114 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7520U | Xeon E3-1280 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 223 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7520U | Xeon E3-1280 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7520U and Xeon E3-1280 v6


Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U
The Ryzen 5 7520U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,063 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1280 v6
Xeon E3-1280 v6
The Xeon E3-1280 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,093 points. Launch price was $612.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 7520U and Xeon E3-1280 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7520U versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 v6 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7520U (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7520U uses the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E3-1280 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7520U scores 9,063 against the Xeon E3-1280 v6's 9,093 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1280 v6. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7520U vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1280 v6.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7520U | Xeon E3-1280 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,063 | 9,093 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,527 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 797 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,744 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7520U uses the FT6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E3-1280 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7520U | Xeon E3-1280 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT6 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5500 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7520U) / not specified (Xeon E3-1280 v6). The Ryzen 5 7520U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon E3-1280 v6 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7520U | Xeon E3-1280 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











