PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7520U

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E5-2643 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 v2 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,063 vs 9,172).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2643 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E5-2643 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7520U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 7520U

2022

Xeon E5-2643 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon E5-2643 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2643 v2 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,063 vs 9,172).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2643 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7520U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2643 v2 better than Ryzen 5 7520U?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2643 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7520U is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2643 v2 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2643 v2 is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2643 v2 still looks like the safer overall buy. Xeon E5-2643 v2 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7520U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013) and a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7520U Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2643 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-2643 v2
1080p
low	170 FPS	174 FPS
medium	135 FPS	146 FPS
high	108 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	147 FPS
medium	112 FPS	121 FPS
high	90 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	67 FPS
medium	64 FPS	59 FPS
high	51 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	37 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-2643 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-2643 v2
1080p
low	227 FPS	229 FPS
medium	227 FPS	206 FPS
high	204 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	148 FPS
1440p
low	227 FPS	208 FPS
medium	199 FPS	185 FPS
high	181 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	136 FPS
4K
low	174 FPS	165 FPS
medium	153 FPS	150 FPS
high	127 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	103 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-2643 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-2643 v2
1080p
low	227 FPS	229 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	227 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	229 FPS
1440p
low	227 FPS	229 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	227 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	229 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	229 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	227 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	219 FPS	229 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-2643 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-2643 v2
1080p
low	227 FPS	229 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	227 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	229 FPS
1440p
low	227 FPS	229 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	227 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	229 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	229 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	227 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	229 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7520U Open Xeon E5-2643 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7520U and Xeon E5-2643 v2

Ryzen 5 7520U

The Ryzen 5 7520U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,063 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2643 v2

The Xeon E5-2643 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,172 points. Launch price was $2,200.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7520U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2643 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2643 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7520U versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2643 v2 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7520U (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7520U uses the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2643 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7520U scores 9,063 against the Xeon E5-2643 v2's 9,172 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2643 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7520U vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2643 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-2643 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+13%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	6 nm-73%	22 nm
Architecture	Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	9,063	9,172+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,527	—
Geekbench 6 Single	797	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,744	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7520U uses the FT6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2643 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7520U	Xeon E5-2643 v2
Socket	FT6	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5-5500	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7520U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2643 v2). The Ryzen 5 7520U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon E5-2643 v2 requires a dedicated GPU.