
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7520U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +79.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7520U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7520U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7520U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (4,527 vs 9,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Ryzen 5 7520U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +79.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7520U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7520U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7520U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 7520U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (4,527 vs 9,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 5 7520U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 7520U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 7520U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 7520U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 7520U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 227 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Ryzen 5 7520U


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U
The Ryzen 5 7520U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,063 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7520U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7520U — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7520U (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7520U uses Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Ryzen 5 7520U's 9,063 — a 64.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 4,527 (70.9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 797, a 47.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 2,744 (36.4% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7520U). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7520U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 7520U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+700% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) |
| PassMark | 17,685+95% | 9,063 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500+110% | 4,527 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295+62% | 797 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 2,744+45% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 7520U uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 5 7520U — the Ryzen 5 7520U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 4 (Ryzen 5 7520U) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and FT6 (Ryzen 5 7520U).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 7520U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FT6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5-5500+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+500% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7520U). The Ryzen 5 7520U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Ryzen 5 7520U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












