
Ryzen 5 6600HS
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6137
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 205W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,975 vs 19,365).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌485.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 205W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,975 vs 19,365).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6137, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌485.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6137 better than Ryzen 5 6600HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600HS and Xeon Gold 6137


Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS
The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 6600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6137 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600HS is built on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600HS scores 18,975 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6137. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+10% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 25 MB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 18,975 | 19,365+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon Gold 6137 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












