Core Ultra 7 266V vs Ryzen 5 6600HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 7 266V

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +24.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $520 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 6600HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 5 6600HS

2022

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 266V across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (18,975 vs 19,274).
  • 105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 266V better than Ryzen 5 6600HS?
Yes. Core Ultra 7 266V is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 24.5% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 7 266V is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.5% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 266V is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 266V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 7 266V is at an unclear MSRP at $520 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 24.5% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 266V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low272 FPS167 FPS
medium243 FPS145 FPS
high205 FPS117 FPS
ultra176 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low230 FPS142 FPS
medium185 FPS122 FPS
high152 FPS98 FPS
ultra134 FPS82 FPS
4K
low161 FPS79 FPS
medium130 FPS72 FPS
high101 FPS57 FPS
ultra89 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low236 FPS353 FPS
medium195 FPS294 FPS
high176 FPS259 FPS
ultra155 FPS228 FPS
1440p
low210 FPS306 FPS
medium181 FPS259 FPS
high164 FPS235 FPS
ultra139 FPS203 FPS
4K
low155 FPS227 FPS
medium138 FPS196 FPS
high132 FPS179 FPS
ultra114 FPS146 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low482 FPS474 FPS
medium482 FPS457 FPS
high482 FPS414 FPS
ultra482 FPS344 FPS
1440p
low482 FPS474 FPS
medium482 FPS400 FPS
high482 FPS360 FPS
ultra468 FPS301 FPS
4K
low482 FPS340 FPS
medium462 FPS284 FPS
high404 FPS246 FPS
ultra336 FPS193 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low482 FPS474 FPS
medium482 FPS474 FPS
high482 FPS474 FPS
ultra482 FPS474 FPS
1440p
low482 FPS474 FPS
medium482 FPS474 FPS
high482 FPS474 FPS
ultra482 FPS474 FPS
4K
low482 FPS474 FPS
medium482 FPS471 FPS
high480 FPS420 FPS
ultra418 FPS364 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 266V and Ryzen 5 6600HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 266V

The Core Ultra 7 266V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,274 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 266V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 266V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 266V versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 266V (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 266V scores 19,274 against the Ryzen 5 6600HS's 18,975 — a 1.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 266V. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 266V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5 GHz+11%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-50%
6 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
19,274+2%
18,975
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 266V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 266VRyzen 5 6600HS
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0