
Ryzen 5 6600HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 4900H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 18,975).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 18,975).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 6600HS better than Ryzen 9 4900H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 9 4900H


Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS
The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H
The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 6600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600HS scores 18,975 against the Ryzen 9 4900H's 18,887 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+2% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-14% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 18,975 | 18,887 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












