
Ryzen 5 6600HS
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 18,975).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 18,975).
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 6600HS better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600HS and Xeon E5-2695 v4


Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS
The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 6600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600HS scores 18,975 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 18 / 36+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+36% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+57% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 45 MB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 18,975 | 18,835 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












