Ryzen 5 6600HS vs Xeon E5-2695 v4

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v4

18 Cores36 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 6600HS

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon E5-2695 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 18,975).
  • 242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 6600HS better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2695 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 6600HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 6600HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 6600HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 6600HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 6600HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 6600HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 18/36. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSXeon E5-2695 v4
1080p
low167 FPS178 FPS
medium145 FPS154 FPS
high117 FPS121 FPS
ultra98 FPS97 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS149 FPS
medium122 FPS126 FPS
high98 FPS95 FPS
ultra82 FPS78 FPS
4K
low79 FPS69 FPS
medium72 FPS62 FPS
high57 FPS47 FPS
ultra45 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSXeon E5-2695 v4
1080p
low353 FPS210 FPS
medium294 FPS191 FPS
high259 FPS162 FPS
ultra228 FPS131 FPS
1440p
low306 FPS180 FPS
medium259 FPS164 FPS
high235 FPS142 FPS
ultra203 FPS110 FPS
4K
low227 FPS114 FPS
medium196 FPS105 FPS
high179 FPS92 FPS
ultra146 FPS73 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSXeon E5-2695 v4
1080p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium457 FPS471 FPS
high414 FPS471 FPS
ultra344 FPS471 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium400 FPS471 FPS
high360 FPS471 FPS
ultra301 FPS471 FPS
4K
low340 FPS447 FPS
medium284 FPS363 FPS
high246 FPS328 FPS
ultra193 FPS274 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSXeon E5-2695 v4
1080p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium474 FPS471 FPS
high474 FPS471 FPS
ultra474 FPS471 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium474 FPS471 FPS
high474 FPS471 FPS
ultra474 FPS457 FPS
4K
low474 FPS471 FPS
medium471 FPS467 FPS
high420 FPS412 FPS
ultra364 FPS356 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600HS and Xeon E5-2695 v4

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v4

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 6600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600HS scores 18,975 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.

FeatureRyzen 5 6600HSXeon E5-2695 v4
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+36%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+57%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
45 MB+181%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
4.5 MB+800%
Process
6 nm-57%
14 nm
Architecture
Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
18,975
18,835
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 6600HSXeon E5-2695 v4
Socket
FP7
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0