PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 4600GE

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $267 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $467 MSRP).
✅Delivers 133.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 79.4 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $467 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon W-11865MLE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,889 vs 15,917).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-11865MLE, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Xeon W-11865MLE

2021

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.1 vs 79.4 PassMark/$ ($467 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 4600GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 4600GE

2020

Xeon W-11865MLE

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $267 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $467 MSRP).
✅Delivers 133.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 79.4 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $467 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon W-11865MLE needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,889 vs 15,917).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-11865MLE, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.1 vs 79.4 PassMark/$ ($467 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 4600GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-11865MLE better than Ryzen 5 4600GE?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-11865MLE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 4600GE is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-11865MLE is the better fit because it leads the single-thread side of the matchup with 7.1% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-11865MLE is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-11865MLE is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 4600GE makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-11865MLE is 133.5% more expensive on MSRP at $467 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it gives you 0.2% higher PassMark. Ryzen 5 4600GE is also 133.1% better value on MSRP (79.4 vs 34.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-11865MLE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), 200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 4600GE Benchmark Check

Xeon W-11865MLE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon W-11865MLE
1080p
low	177 FPS	164 FPS
medium	143 FPS	144 FPS
high	114 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	140 FPS
medium	121 FPS	119 FPS
high	94 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	77 FPS
medium	59 FPS	70 FPS
high	46 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	43 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 4600GE Open Xeon W-11865MLE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon W-11865MLE
1080p
low	298 FPS	296 FPS
medium	257 FPS	255 FPS
high	229 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	198 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	261 FPS	253 FPS
medium	229 FPS	226 FPS
high	208 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	170 FPS
4K
low	225 FPS	157 FPS
medium	202 FPS	142 FPS
high	182 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	119 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 4600GE Open Xeon W-11865MLE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon W-11865MLE
1080p
low	397 FPS	398 FPS
medium	397 FPS	398 FPS
high	397 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	397 FPS
1440p
low	397 FPS	398 FPS
medium	397 FPS	398 FPS
high	397 FPS	397 FPS
ultra	362 FPS	331 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	379 FPS
medium	332 FPS	315 FPS
high	286 FPS	282 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	224 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 4600GE Open Xeon W-11865MLE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon W-11865MLE
1080p
low	397 FPS	398 FPS
medium	397 FPS	398 FPS
high	397 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	398 FPS
1440p
low	397 FPS	398 FPS
medium	397 FPS	398 FPS
high	397 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	397 FPS	398 FPS
4K
low	397 FPS	398 FPS
medium	397 FPS	398 FPS
high	378 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	316 FPS	363 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 4600GE Open Xeon W-11865MLE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 4600GE and Xeon W-11865MLE

Ryzen 5 4600GE

The Ryzen 5 4600GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-11865MLE

The Xeon W-11865MLE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,917 points. Launch price was $467.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 4600GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-11865MLE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-11865MLE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600GE versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MLE — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11865MLE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 4600GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600GE scores 15,889 against the Xeon W-11865MLE's 15,917 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-11865MLE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600GE vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MLE.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon W-11865MLE
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.5 GHz+7%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+120%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark	15,889	15,917
Cinebench R23 Multi	7,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 4600GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon W-11865MLE
Socket	AM4	FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 4600GE) / not specified (Xeon W-11865MLE). The Ryzen 5 4600GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Xeon W-11865MLE requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon W-11865MLE
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Vega 7	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 4600GE launched at $200 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11865MLE debuted at $467. On MSRP ($200 vs $467), the Ryzen 5 4600GE is $267 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 4600GE delivers 79.4 pts/$ vs 34.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11865MLE — making the Ryzen 5 4600GE the 79.9% better value option.