
Ryzen 5 2600
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1581
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.1 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,173).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1581, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon D-1581
2016Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.9 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Xeon D-1581
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 1.5 MB).
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.1 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,173).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1581, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.9 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 2600 better than Xeon D-1581?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 302 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600 and Xeon D-1581


Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581
The Xeon D-1581 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,173 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1581 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-1581 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon D-1581 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon D-1581 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600 scores 13,145 against the Xeon D-1581's 13,173 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon D-1581. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600 vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1581.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+63% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+89% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+967% | 1.5 MB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,145 | 13,173 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,344 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,163 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,893 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1581 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1667 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2600) / not specified (Xeon D-1581). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | General Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 2600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1581 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($199 vs $400), the Ryzen 5 2600 is $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2600 delivers 66.1 pts/$ vs 32.9 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1581 — making the Ryzen 5 2600 the 66.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Xeon D-1581 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-50% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.1+101% | 32.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












