
Ryzen 5 2600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 3500X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,165).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.1 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 3500X.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,165).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.1 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3500X better than Ryzen 5 2600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 160 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 5 3500X


Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 3500X's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X — a 5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600 scores 13,145 against the Ryzen 5 3500X's 13,165 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% |
| Architecture | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,145 | 13,165 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,344 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,163 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,893 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 3500X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 2600) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3500X) — the Ryzen 5 3500X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B450,AMD X470,AMD B350,AMD X370 (Ryzen 5 2600) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series (Ryzen 5 3500X).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2600) / not specified (Ryzen 5 3500X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | General Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 2600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3500X debuted at $155. On MSRP ($199 vs $155), the Ryzen 5 3500X is $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2600 delivers 66.1 pts/$ vs 84.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3500X — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 25% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $155-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.1 | 84.9+28% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












