Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 4700U

AMD

Ryzen 5 2600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 4700U

8 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 2600

2018

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 4700U.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,174).
  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 4700U

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 4700U better than Ryzen 5 2600?
Yes. Ryzen 7 4700U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 4700U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 4700U is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 4700U is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 2600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 4700U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 4700U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 7 4700U
1080p
low183 FPS169 FPS
medium157 FPS139 FPS
high127 FPS110 FPS
ultra102 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS146 FPS
medium125 FPS118 FPS
high98 FPS92 FPS
ultra77 FPS73 FPS
4K
low68 FPS68 FPS
medium60 FPS59 FPS
high47 FPS46 FPS
ultra38 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 7 4700U
1080p
low263 FPS180 FPS
medium227 FPS153 FPS
high202 FPS139 FPS
ultra162 FPS121 FPS
1440p
low236 FPS157 FPS
medium206 FPS136 FPS
high183 FPS126 FPS
ultra151 FPS108 FPS
4K
low186 FPS124 FPS
medium165 FPS112 FPS
high146 FPS105 FPS
ultra111 FPS92 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 7 4700U
1080p
low329 FPS329 FPS
medium329 FPS329 FPS
high329 FPS329 FPS
ultra329 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low329 FPS329 FPS
medium329 FPS329 FPS
high322 FPS329 FPS
ultra268 FPS329 FPS
4K
low304 FPS329 FPS
medium248 FPS329 FPS
high215 FPS317 FPS
ultra167 FPS257 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 7 4700U
1080p
low329 FPS329 FPS
medium329 FPS329 FPS
high329 FPS329 FPS
ultra329 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low329 FPS329 FPS
medium329 FPS329 FPS
high329 FPS329 FPS
ultra329 FPS329 FPS
4K
low329 FPS329 FPS
medium329 FPS329 FPS
high329 FPS329 FPS
ultra310 FPS284 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 7 4700U

AMD

Ryzen 5 2600

The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Ryzen 7 4700U

The Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,174 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4700U offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 4700U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700U — a 5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4700U (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700U uses Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600 scores 13,145 against the Ryzen 7 4700U's 13,174 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 4700U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4700U.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 7 4700U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz+5%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+70%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+100%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
512 kB (per core)
Process
12 nm
7 nm-42%
Architecture
Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
PassMark
13,145
13,174
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,344
Geekbench 6 Single
1,163
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,893
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 7 4700U
Socket
AM4
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4700U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.

FeatureRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 7 4700U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
General Productivity