
Ryzen 5 2600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 4700U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 4700U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,174).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 4700U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Ryzen 7 4700U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 4700U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,174).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 4700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 4700U better than Ryzen 5 2600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 92 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 257 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 284 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 7 4700U


Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 4700U
Ryzen 7 4700U
The Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,174 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4700U offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 4700U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4700U — a 5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 4700U (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4700U uses Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600 scores 13,145 against the Ryzen 7 4700U's 13,174 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 4700U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4700U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm-42% |
| Architecture | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 13,145 | 13,174 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,344 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,163 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,893 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 4700U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 4700U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | General Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












