
Ryzen 5 2600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +51.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌65.3% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +51.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,145 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌65.3% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 5 2600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 242 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 396 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2600 and Ryzen 7 3700X


Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600 scores 13,145 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 52.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% |
| Architecture | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,145 | 22,430+71% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,344 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,163 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,893 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 2600) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B450,AMD X470,AMD B350,AMD X370 (Ryzen 5 2600) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2600) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | General Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 2600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. On MSRP ($199 vs $329), the Ryzen 5 2600 is $130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2600 delivers 66.1 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 3.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2600 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.1 | 68.2+3% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












