
Ryzen 5 2400GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-4610 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Xeon E5-4610 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4610 v3.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-4610 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,229 vs 7,237).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Xeon E5-4610 v3
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Xeon E5-4610 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4610 v3.
Why buy it
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4610 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4610 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,229 vs 7,237).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 2400GE better than Xeon E5-4610 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E5-4610 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E5-4610 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E5-4610 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E5-4610 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon E5-4610 v3


Ryzen 5 2400GE
Ryzen 5 2400GE
The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4610 v3
Xeon E5-4610 v3
The Xeon E5-4610 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,229 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 2400GE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4610 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-4610 v3 — a 76.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2400GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2400GE scores 7,237 against the Xeon E5-4610 v3's 7,229 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 2400GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4610 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E5-4610 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+124% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+88% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+525% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 7,237 | 7,229 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 826 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,847 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E5-4610 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE) / not specified (Xeon E5-4610 v3). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Xeon E5-4610 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E5-4610 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 11 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













