Ryzen 5 2400GE vs Xeon E5-2637 v3

AMD

Ryzen 5 2400GE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2014

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 2400GE

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $827 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
  • Delivers 488.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Xeon E5-2637 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,248).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2637 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • +275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 42.8 PassMark/$ ($996 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 2400GE better than Xeon E5-2637 v3?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2637 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2400GE is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v3 is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 2400GE is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 2400GE is $827 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $996 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2637 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 488.5% better value on MSRP (42.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 2400GE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
1080p
low162 FPS168 FPS
medium140 FPS143 FPS
high111 FPS115 FPS
ultra89 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low138 FPS142 FPS
medium117 FPS119 FPS
high92 FPS94 FPS
ultra73 FPS75 FPS
4K
low63 FPS64 FPS
medium56 FPS57 FPS
high44 FPS45 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
1080p
low181 FPS181 FPS
medium173 FPS181 FPS
high160 FPS175 FPS
ultra126 FPS140 FPS
1440p
low169 FPS181 FPS
medium146 FPS166 FPS
high135 FPS151 FPS
ultra111 FPS124 FPS
4K
low126 FPS138 FPS
medium111 FPS120 FPS
high90 FPS98 FPS
ultra65 FPS71 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
1080p
low181 FPS181 FPS
medium181 FPS181 FPS
high181 FPS181 FPS
ultra181 FPS181 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS181 FPS
medium181 FPS181 FPS
high181 FPS181 FPS
ultra181 FPS181 FPS
4K
low181 FPS181 FPS
medium181 FPS181 FPS
high181 FPS181 FPS
ultra181 FPS181 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
1080p
low181 FPS181 FPS
medium181 FPS181 FPS
high181 FPS181 FPS
ultra181 FPS181 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS181 FPS
medium181 FPS181 FPS
high181 FPS181 FPS
ultra181 FPS181 FPS
4K
low181 FPS181 FPS
medium181 FPS181 FPS
high181 FPS181 FPS
ultra181 FPS181 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon E5-2637 v3

AMD

Ryzen 5 2400GE

The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v3

The Xeon E5-2637 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,248 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon E5-2637 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v3 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2400GE (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2400GE scores 7,237 against the Xeon E5-2637 v3's 7,248 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 v3. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2637 v3.

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+3%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
15 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
7,237
7,248
Geekbench 6 Single
826
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,847
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
Socket
AM4
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2637 v3). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 11
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 2400GE launched at $169 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 debuted at $996. On MSRP ($169 vs $996), the Ryzen 5 2400GE is $827 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2400GE delivers 42.8 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2637 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 2400GE the 141.9% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 2400GEXeon E5-2637 v3
MSRP
$169-83%
$996
Performance per Dollar
42.8+486%
7.3
Release Date
2018
2014