
Ryzen 5 2400GE
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1270 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.8 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Xeon E3-1270 v3
2013Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,236 vs 7,237).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 42.8 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Xeon E3-1270 v3
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 100.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 42.8 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,236 vs 7,237).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.3 vs 42.8 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 2400GE better than Xeon E3-1270 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 76 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 181 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon E3-1270 v3


Ryzen 5 2400GE
Ryzen 5 2400GE
The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1270 v3
Xeon E3-1270 v3
The Xeon E3-1270 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,236 points. Launch price was $370.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 2400GE and Xeon E3-1270 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1270 v3 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1270 v3 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1270 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2400GE scores 7,237 against the Xeon E3-1270 v3's 7,236 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 2400GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1270 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 7,237 | 7,236 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 826 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,847 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 2400GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1270 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE) / not specified (Xeon E3-1270 v3). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Xeon E3-1270 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 11 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 2400GE launched at $169 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1270 v3 debuted at $339. On MSRP ($169 vs $339), the Ryzen 5 2400GE is $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 2400GE delivers 42.8 pts/$ vs 21.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1270 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 2400GE the 66.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 2400GE | Xeon E3-1270 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-50% | $339 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.8+101% | 21.3 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













