Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 3 7320U

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 3 7320U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

••••i5-13400F•••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

+190.1%

8,627

0.0%

FX-6350

Ryzen 3 3350U

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +124.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅400% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7320U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 3 7320U

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (4,907 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Ryzen 3 7320U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +124.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
✅400% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7320U.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (4,907 vs 16,211).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 3 7320U?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 124.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 230.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 190.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 124.7% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 230.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 124.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 7320U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	171 FPS	168 FPS
medium	158 FPS	134 FPS
high	132 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	141 FPS
medium	123 FPS	111 FPS
high	99 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	65 FPS
medium	74 FPS	55 FPS
high	59 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 3 7320U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	545 FPS	216 FPS
medium	464 FPS	216 FPS
high	389 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	216 FPS
medium	403 FPS	195 FPS
high	345 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	171 FPS
medium	247 FPS	151 FPS
high	231 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	105 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 3 7320U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	530 FPS	216 FPS
medium	449 FPS	216 FPS
high	415 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	216 FPS
medium	422 FPS	216 FPS
high	382 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	216 FPS
medium	331 FPS	216 FPS
high	296 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 3 7320U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	626 FPS	216 FPS
medium	626 FPS	216 FPS
high	626 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	216 FPS
medium	626 FPS	216 FPS
high	598 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	216 FPS
medium	492 FPS	216 FPS
high	439 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Ryzen 3 7320U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 3 7320U

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen 3 7320U

The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7320U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 3 7320U's 8,627 — a 97.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 4,907 (107.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,213, a 66% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 3,589 (104.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320U.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 3 7320U
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+150%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+12%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+400%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	6 nm-14%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
PassMark	25,029+190%	8,627
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211+230%	4,907
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+98%	1,213
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408+218%	3,589

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Ryzen 3 7320U) — the Core i5-13400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and FT6 (Ryzen 3 7320U).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen 3 7320U
Socket	LGA1700	FT6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	LPDDR5-5500
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+1100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+400%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U). The Ryzen 3 7320U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.