
Ryzen 3 2300X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2650L v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,986 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3069.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,612).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-2650L v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Xeon E5-2650L v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,986 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3069.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 1.8 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+525% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,612).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 2300X better than Xeon E5-2650L v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 67 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 190 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 190 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 2300X and Xeon E5-2650L v2


Ryzen 3 2300X
Ryzen 3 2300X
The Ryzen 3 2300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,564 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2650L v2
Xeon E5-2650L v2
The Xeon E5-2650L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,612 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 2300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300X versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v2 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2300X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 3 2300X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 2300X scores 7,564 against the Xeon E5-2650L v2's 7,612 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2650L v2. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300X vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+100% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+106% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+525% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,564 | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 2300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 2300X launched at $129 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2650L v2 debuted at $4115. On MSRP ($129 vs $4115), the Ryzen 3 2300X is $3986 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 2300X delivers 58.6 pts/$ vs 1.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2650L v2 — making the Ryzen 3 2300X the 187.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E5-2650L v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-97% | $4115 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+3156% | 1.8 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











