Ryzen 3 2300X
Popular choices:
Xeon E3-1276 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 35.4 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1276 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon E3-1276 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,543 vs 7,564).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.4 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Xeon E3-1276 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 35.4 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1276 v3, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,543 vs 7,564).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.4 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 2300X better than Xeon E3-1276 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1276 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1276 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1276 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 189 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1276 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 2300X and Xeon E3-1276 v3
Ryzen 3 2300X
Ryzen 3 2300X
The Ryzen 3 2300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,564 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E3-1276 v3
Xeon E3-1276 v3
The Xeon E3-1276 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,543 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 2300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1276 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1276 v3 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2300X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 2300X is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 2300X scores 7,564 against the Xeon E3-1276 v3's 7,543 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 2300X. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300X vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E3-1276 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1276 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 7,564 | 7,543 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 2300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1276 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 2300X launched at $129 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 debuted at $213. On MSRP ($129 vs $213), the Ryzen 3 2300X is $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 2300X delivers 58.6 pts/$ vs 35.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1276 v3 — making the Ryzen 3 2300X the 49.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1276 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-39% | $213 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+66% | 35.4 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 3 2300X and Xeon E3-1276 v3
