
Ryzen 3 2300X
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1545M v5
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $452 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 345.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,640).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1545M v5, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Xeon E3-1545M v5
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($581 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Xeon E3-1545M v5
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $452 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 345.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $581 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,640).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1545M v5, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($581 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 2300X better than Xeon E3-1545M v5?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1545M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1545M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1545M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 191 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1545M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 2300X and Xeon E3-1545M v5


Ryzen 3 2300X
Ryzen 3 2300X
The Ryzen 3 2300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,564 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1545M v5
Xeon E3-1545M v5
The Xeon E3-1545M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,640 points. Launch price was $679.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 2300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1545M v5's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1545M v5 — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2300X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 3 2300X uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1545M v5 uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 2300X scores 7,564 against the Xeon E3-1545M v5's 7,640 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E3-1545M v5. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300X vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1545M v5.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1545M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+21% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Skylake-H (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 7,564 | 7,640+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 2300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1545M v5 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1545M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 2300X launched at $129 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1545M v5 debuted at $581. On MSRP ($129 vs $581), the Ryzen 3 2300X is $452 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 2300X delivers 58.6 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1545M v5 — making the Ryzen 3 2300X the 126.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 2300X | Xeon E3-1545M v5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-78% | $581 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+347% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











