Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E5-4607

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4607.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,986).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4607, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4607 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4607

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 1300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Xeon E5-4607

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4607.

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,986).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4607, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4607 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 1300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Xeon E5-4607?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4607 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 1300X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4607 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 1300X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 1300X is at an unclear MSRP at $129 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-4607 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 1300X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 3 1300X Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4607 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E5-4607
1080p
low	173 FPS	156 FPS
medium	156 FPS	134 FPS
high	127 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	132 FPS
medium	124 FPS	111 FPS
high	98 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	62 FPS
medium	59 FPS	56 FPS
high	46 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	34 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 1300X Open Xeon E5-4607

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E5-4607
1080p
low	173 FPS	118 FPS
medium	169 FPS	104 FPS
high	157 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	169 FPS	104 FPS
medium	145 FPS	92 FPS
high	133 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	132 FPS	83 FPS
medium	117 FPS	75 FPS
high	96 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	47 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 1300X Open Xeon E5-4607

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E5-4607
1080p
low	173 FPS	175 FPS
medium	173 FPS	175 FPS
high	173 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	175 FPS
1440p
low	173 FPS	175 FPS
medium	173 FPS	175 FPS
high	173 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	175 FPS
4K
low	173 FPS	175 FPS
medium	173 FPS	175 FPS
high	160 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	175 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 1300X Open Xeon E5-4607

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E5-4607
1080p
low	173 FPS	175 FPS
medium	173 FPS	175 FPS
high	173 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	175 FPS
1440p
low	173 FPS	175 FPS
medium	173 FPS	175 FPS
high	173 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	175 FPS
4K
low	173 FPS	175 FPS
medium	173 FPS	175 FPS
high	173 FPS	175 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	175 FPS

Open Ryzen 3 1300X Open Xeon E5-4607

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon E5-4607

Ryzen 3 1300X

The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

Xeon E5-4607

The Xeon E5-4607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,986 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 1300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-4607 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4607 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4607 — a 50.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4607 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Xeon E5-4607's 6,986 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-4607. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4607.

Feature	Ryzen 3 1300X	Xeon E5-4607
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+68%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+55%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,923	6,986
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,486	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,120	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,155	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4607 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.