
Ryzen 3 1300X
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2124
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 71W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2124.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2124 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon E-2124 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2124
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,915 vs 6,923).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Xeon E-2124
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 71W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E-2124.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2124 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Xeon E-2124 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,915 vs 6,923).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Xeon E-2124?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Xeon E-2124 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Xeon E-2124 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Xeon E-2124 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 156 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Xeon E-2124 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon E-2124


Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

Xeon E-2124
Xeon E-2124
The Xeon E-2124 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 71 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 6,915 points. Launch price was $193.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 3 1300X and Xeon E-2124 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon E-2124 — a 15% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2124 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2124 uses Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Xeon E-2124's 6,915 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 1300X. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Xeon E-2124 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 6,923 | 6,915 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,486 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,120 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,155 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2124 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Xeon E-2124 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X) / not specified (Xeon E-2124). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Xeon E-2124 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













