Ryzen 3 1300X vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,928).
  • Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U better than Ryzen 3 1300X?
Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.3% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $129 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 1300X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the smarter recommendation now. At roughly 6,923 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
1080p
low173 FPS170 FPS
medium156 FPS151 FPS
high127 FPS123 FPS
ultra99 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS141 FPS
medium124 FPS120 FPS
high98 FPS96 FPS
ultra75 FPS76 FPS
4K
low67 FPS64 FPS
medium59 FPS58 FPS
high46 FPS46 FPS
ultra36 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
1080p
low173 FPS118 FPS
medium169 FPS104 FPS
high157 FPS96 FPS
ultra124 FPS77 FPS
1440p
low169 FPS102 FPS
medium145 FPS89 FPS
high133 FPS83 FPS
ultra110 FPS69 FPS
4K
low132 FPS76 FPS
medium117 FPS69 FPS
high96 FPS56 FPS
ultra72 FPS42 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
4K
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high160 FPS173 FPS
ultra128 FPS173 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
4K
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,928 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 1300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U's 6,928 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.

FeatureRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+62%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
6,923
6,928
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,486
Geekbench 6 Single
1,120
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,155
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
Socket
AM4
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.

FeatureRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming