
Ryzen 3 1300X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,928).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,928).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U better than Ryzen 3 1300X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 173 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U


Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.


Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,928 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 1300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U's 6,928 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+62% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 6,923 | 6,928 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,486 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,120 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,155 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













