
Ryzen 3 1300X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,486 vs 9,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +78.8% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 65.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌54.3% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +78.8% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 65.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,486 vs 9,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌54.3% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Ryzen 3 1300X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 5 3600


Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 1300X packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 1300X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 1300X scores 6,923 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 87.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,486 vs 9,500 (92.6% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,120 vs 1,295, a 14.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,155 vs 1,898 (49.8% advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,923 | 17,685+155% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,486 | 9,500+173% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,120 | 1,295+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,155+66% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 1300X) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 1300X launched at $129 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($129 vs $199), the Ryzen 3 1300X is $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 1300X delivers 53.7 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 49.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 1300X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-35% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.7 | 88.9+66% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













