Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon RX 7600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 165W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅145.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌230% higher power demand at 165W vs 50W.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 165W, a 115W reduction.

Why buy it

✅145.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌230% higher power demand at 165W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?

Yes. Radeon RX 7600 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 7600 averages 145.9% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 16,581 vs 5,862 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7600 is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Intel Arc Pro A30M is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 182.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7600 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 7600 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $269 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 145.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 182.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Intel Arc Pro A30M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Intel Arc Pro A30M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if Radeon RX 7600 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel Arc Pro A30M Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	101 FPS	168 FPS
medium	90 FPS	149 FPS
high	76 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	140 FPS
medium	78 FPS	114 FPS
high	65 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	46 FPS	85 FPS
medium	43 FPS	72 FPS
high	31 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	52 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon RX 7600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	143 FPS	414 FPS
medium	105 FPS	349 FPS
high	74 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	241 FPS
medium	61 FPS	205 FPS
high	46 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	42 FPS	109 FPS
medium	31 FPS	91 FPS
high	25 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	57 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon RX 7600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	264 FPS	746 FPS
medium	211 FPS	597 FPS
high	176 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	560 FPS
medium	158 FPS	448 FPS
high	132 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	280 FPS
4K
low	132 FPS	373 FPS
medium	106 FPS	298 FPS
high	86 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	187 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon RX 7600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	264 FPS	604 FPS
medium	211 FPS	517 FPS
high	176 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	468 FPS
medium	158 FPS	397 FPS
high	132 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	293 FPS
medium	77 FPS	271 FPS
high	67 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	187 FPS

Open Intel Arc Pro A30M Open Radeon RX 7600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and Radeon RX 7600

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 182.9%. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score	5,862	16,581+183%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS	21.75 TFLOPS+431%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz	2655 MHz+33%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	128+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	8	32+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A30M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Arc Pro A30M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	System	288 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 107% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon RX 7600
TDP	50W-70%	165W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	117.2+17%	100.5